Parliament is where politicians known as Members of Parliament (MPs) meet to create laws, discuss issues that affect the public and make decisions for the UK, such as how money is spent. MPs meet in the Palace of Westminster – known simply as Westminster – a beautiful old building on London’s River Thames. However, the building needs lots of repairs and there is a debate about what MPs should do while the work takes place. Moving them out temporarily is the quickest and cheapest option but some say Parliament should stay in London, even if it will cost more. Others think this is a chance to relocate Parliament permanently so that another part of the UK can become the home of Government instead of everything being in London. What do you think?
Yes – other cities deserve the same attention
Relocating Parliament could benefit other parts of the UK. Moving thousands of people to another city would create demand for homes, offices, restaurants and shops, bringing new jobs and money to areas that need it. The move could also boost tourism for the new seat of Parliament, making more people want to visit. The mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, has said that MPs’ decision-making is too focused on London, meaning they don’t think as much about people in other parts of the country. Moving out of the capital could give MPs a wider view of the UK. Also, if MPs and staff left Westminster, builders could get on with the repairs more easily, which could save the country billions of pounds.
Article continues belowNo – the Government should stay
London is the UK’s capital and Westminster has been the centre of British politics for centuries, which, to some people, make it an important part of the country’s history. The building itself is on the UNESCO World Heritage List, meaning it’s recognised around the world for its cultural and historical importance, so it should be kept in use as the home of Parliament. Besides, moving Parliament somewhere else could be difficult for MPs. Lindsay Hoyle, The Speaker of the House (an MP who keeps order in Parliament), has said it would be impractical. Many people might have to move to another part of the country. There is also uncertainty about what would happen to the building if Parliament decided to move for good.